San
Diego Jewish World
Letter from
Jerusalem Residents of Sderot have been living for years under the constant threat of sirens, running for cover, and then an explosion. Their nerves are exhausted. They are screaming for the government to do something. |
|||||
5/19/07
SDJW Report (click on headline below to jump to the story) International and National *Reoccupying Gaza not worth the price *Feingold tells reasons for urging Iraq pullout Daily Features Jews in the News Jewish Grapevine Regional and Local A Jewish story everywhere: Three newspapers serve Ocean Hills Country Club Arts, Entertainment & Dining For Your Reference San Diego Jewish Community Calendar San Diego Jewish Community Directory Advertisements Anderson Travel Israel Contemporary String Quartet JFS Pete Earley Josephine Tonight Archives Return to Home Page |
Politicians, especially those in opposition, are calling for a massive invasion
of Gaza. The calculus is, how many soldiers to sacrifice for the sake of
missiles that seldom kill civilians? And whatever solution is chosen will be
temporary. The missiles are easy to make and carry, and no one sees an end to a
situation where one or another Palestinian political movement, family, or
neighborhood gang justifies itself by firing them into Israel. We also know that Hamas and others are smuggling great quantities of weapons from Egypt. Should the IDF sweep through Gaza and clean out the arsenals before Hamas is ready for a more serious war with Israel? Again, how many soldiers should we sacrifice for the sake of what can only be partial and temporary? Should we threaten war with Egypt in order to stop the smuggling? Or should we content ourselves with preparing the IDF for a major war when it comes, and hope that it does not come? This increase in missile launches toward Israel is associated with violence among Palestinians. |
|
|||
Gaza is in extremis, with chaos on the streets, and rooms full of newspeople huddled together on the floor, each with a cellphone to his (or her) ear, afraid of bullets and kidnappers should they venture outside. Hamas seems to have the upper hand, but it is not all that clear. The basic warfare is between families and neighborhood gangs, some of which are now aligned with Fatah or Hamas. It is another demonstration that Golda Meier was right: Palestine does not exist. Family, clan, and local loyalties are more important than national identity. With the increased salience of Islam, religious fervor is tying many people to Hamas, but others to movements they consider more purely Islamic than Hamas. Once people are listening to a spiritual voice, there is no limit to how far they may travel. Whoever was firing the crude rockets employed an element of Middle Eastern logic: by causing enough mayhem among the Jews, and bringing the IDF to kill Palestinians, they may stop Palestinians from killing one another. There is another bit of Middle East logic: Gazans are urging an Israeli invasion that will stop the chaos. At least for now, they would rather be governed by Jews than by other Palestinians. We have our own Middle East logic: there are some invitations we should not accept. IDF attack helicopters are at work, guided to targets by blimps and unmanned aircraft that provide constant cover, each with their cameras (night and day) directed by young men and women in Israel. There is also low tech spying by Palestinians on Palestinians for the sake of Israeli cash and other goodies. This is how we know in which room or in which car we can find targets. Mahmoud Abbas, the impotent president of Palestine, is staying out of Gaza while he calls on Hamas to accept another cease fire. He cancelled one trip when his people discovered Hamas planning to ambush his motorcade. Now he is calling Condoleezza Rice and others, demanding that American and European governments stop the killing by Israelis. Another idea is to invite international peacekeepers into Gaza. To protect who from whom? So far we have the endorsement of the White House and the State Department. "Israel has a right to defend itself, and has shown considerable restraint until now." That will last until one of the smart missiles makes a mistake and kills too many women, children, or old men. Deaths from Israeli airstrikes are starting to compete with the numbers of Palestinians killed by Palestinians. Those of us who remember Vietnam know that body counts do not produce victory. Quality is more important than quantity. When our helicopters manage to pick off enough of the key people, or when they tire of living in the cellars, the next element in the scenario will come into play: a Palestinian declaration of cease fire. It will not cover all who make, carry, and fire the crude missiles, but with pressure from the outside it may produce another period of Israeli restraint. That will last until the next time Palestinian violence becomes intolerable. Sharkansky is a professor emeritus of political science at Hebrew University of Jerusalem The Iraq Debate Mr. President, as we speak, more than 150,000 brave American troops are in the middle of a violent civil war in Iraq, with more troops on the way. Meanwhile, the President has repeatedly made it clear that nothing – not the wishes of the American people, not the advice of military and foreign policy experts, not the concerns of members of both parties -- will discourage him from pursuing a war that has no end in sight. Congress cannot wait for the President to change course – we must change the course ourselves. Iraq’s problems will not be solved by an open-ended, massive U.S. military engagement. And our own national security will be weakened until we bring this war to a close. That is why, Mr. President, I am pleased to join the Majority Leader and Senators Dodd, Whitehouse, Sanders, Leahy, Kerry, Kennedy, Boxer, Harkin, and Wyden in introducing an amendment to bring this war to a close. Our amendment, which is the same as the Feingold-Reid bill, would require the President to begin safely redeploying US troops from Iraq within 120 days of enactment, and would require redeployment to be completed by March 31, 2008. At that point, with our troops safely out of Iraq, funding for the war would be ended, with three specific and limited exceptions: protecting U.S. infrastructure and personnel; training and equipping Iraqi security forces; and, perhaps most important, conducting “targeted operations, limited in duration and scope, against members of al Qaeda and other international terrorist organizations.” By enacting Feingold-Reid, we can finally focus on what should be our top national security priority -- defeating al Qaeda. Defeating al Qaeda means recognizing that the U.S. presence in Iraq is being used as a recruiting tool for terrorist organizations from around the world. The longer we stay in Iraq, the longer that country will continue to be what the recently declassified National Intelligence Estimate called a “cause celebre” for a new generation of terrorists. Defeating al Qaeda also means recognizing that it is not a one-country franchise, Mr. President. While we have been distracted in Iraq, terrorist networks have developed new capabilities and found new sources of support throughout the world. By redeploying our troops from Iraq, we can refocus on creating a more effective, comprehensive strategy to defeat these networks. Consider how our efforts in Afghanistan, the country where the 9/11 attacks were plotted, have been short-changed by the Administration’s myopic focus on Iraq. Afghanistan has been put on the back-burner, and if we don’t strengthen our efforts to defeat the Taliban and to help create long-term stability in Afghanistan and the region, Afghanistan will remain what it was on 9/11 – a haven for those that seek to harm our country, and a bastion of instability with dire consequences for our national security. Somalia is another instance in which the U.S. government response has been insufficient. Last fall, Mr. President, it became publicly known that the Administration had, for quite some time, been narrowly focusing on targeting terrorists in Somalia instead of taking a holistic approach to dealing with that country’s fragility and grave weaknesses. The situation on the ground continues to be unstable and tense, and the administration’s initial response – or lack thereof – suggests they were too focused elsewhere to properly address how failed states, terrorist safe havens, instability, and regional conflict can interlock to create chaos and lawlessness. Mr. President, we can no longer ignore the rest of the world to focus solely on Iraq. We need a strategy for a post-redeployment Iraq and the region that allows us to refocus our global fight against al-Qaeda. Contrary to what the Administration has implied, al Qaeda is not abandoning its efforts to fight us globally so that it can fight us in Iraq. As we redeploy from Iraq, and afterwards, we should continue to provide assistance to the Iraqi government and people. We should work with the Iraqi government, and key players in the region, to find a legitimate political solution that is inclusive and sustainable. We must not abandon the country and allow it to become another failed state, like Afghanistan in the 1990s or Somalia. If we do, al Qaeda will exploit it to its advantage. But we cannot – we must not – allow this war to continue. It is time to end the war, Mr. President, and the way to do that is by ending funding for the war. That’s what the Feingold-Reid amendment does. Some have suggested that cutting off funds for the war could mean cutting off funds for the troops. They would have people believe that, under my approach, our brave troops will be left to fend for themselves in Iraq, without training, equipment or resources. Nothing could be further from the truth. Using our power of the purse to end our involvement in the war would in no way endanger our brave servicemembers. By setting a date after which funding for the war will be terminated -- as this amendment proposes -- Congress can ensure that our troops are safely redeployed without harming our troops For those who don’t believe this can be done, let me cite an example from not too long ago. In October 1993, Congress enacted an amendment sponsored by the senior Senator from West Virginia cutting off funding for military operations in Somalia effective March 31, 1994, with limited exceptions. 76 Senators voted for that amendment. Many of them are still in this body, including Senators Levin, Cochran, Domenici, Hutchison, Lugar, McConnell, Specter, Stevens and Warner. Did those Senators jeopardize the safety and security of U.S. troops in Somalia? By cutting off funds for a military mission, were they indifferent to the well-being of our brave men and women in uniform? Of course not, Mr. President. All of these members recognized that Congress had the power and the responsibility to bring our military operations in Somalia to a close, by establishing a date after which funds would be terminated. That same day, several Senators supported an even stronger effort to end funding for Somalia operations. The amendment offered by Senator McCain would have simply eliminated funding to keep U.S. troops in Somalia. Funds would only have been provided to withdraw U.S. troops. I was one of 38 Senators who opposed a measure to table the McCain amendment. I can assure my colleagues that none of those 38 Senators was indifferent to the safety of our troops. We knew that the McCain amendment was an appropriate, safe, responsible way to use our power of the purse to bring an ill-conceived military mission to a close without in any way harming our troops. As Senator Hatch said at the time, “The McCain amendment provides the President with the flexibility needed to bring our forces home with honor and without endangering the safety of American troops.” Mr. President, the same is true today of the Feingold-Reid amendment. While Feingold-Reid is not the only amendment we are considering, it is the only amendment that would bring this war to a close. I regret to say that the Levin-Reid amendment accomplishes very little, once the President gets through certifying and waiving whatever he needs to certify and waive to keep his policies in place. Levin-Reid would ensure that Congress receives more reports on Iraqi progress in meeting benchmarks. Mr. President, we don’t need reports to tell us that the President’s policy isn’t working. And we don’t need reports to show us that our continued military presence in Iraq is a mistake, one that the American people overwhelmingly oppose. It’s long past time for benchmarks, let alone benchmarks that aren’t tied to meaningful consequences. Feingold-Reid will move us toward ending the war. Levin-Reid will move us backward. As long as the President's Iraq policy goes unchecked, our courageous troops will continue to put their lives on the line unnecessarily, our constituents will continue to pour billions of their dollars into this war, our military readiness will continue to erode, and our ability to confront and defeat al Qaeda will be jeopardized. I urge my colleagues to support Feingold-Reid and oppose Levin-Reid.
Where:
Doubletree Hotel - Mission Valley ∙ 7450 Hazard Center
Drive, San Diego, CA 92108
When: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 ∙ 11:15am - 1:30pm
Crazy: A Father’s Search Through America’s Mental Health
Madness, details Pete Earley’s
REGISTER NOW Information
& Registration ∙ (858) 637-3231
*San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders says the city
will investigate what went wrong, not who to blame, in the city failing to act
immediately to stop construction of a 180-foot high building owned by Aaron
Feldman that the FAA believed would interfere with aviation at Montgomery
Field. The
story by Jennifer Vigil is in today’s San Diego Union-Tribune.
A Jewish Story Everywhere OCEANSIDE, Calif—The Oceanside Hills Country Club
has 1,633 residences, mostly detached two-story houses, for seniors. It also has
a golf course, tennis courts, a large clubhouse with gym and meeting places for
hobby and crafts enthusiasts, gardens, a nice walking path, and, surprise, not
one, not two, but three newsletters. In another part of the paper, a report from the
Founders Duplicate Bridge Club began: "Our Passover and Easter get-together
turned out to be delightful affair. The ice cream cake was beautifully
decorated and simply delicious." I found myself wondering what kind of
flour was in the cake. A few pages later, OHSPA, which I took to mean Ocean
Hills Society for the Performing Arts" reported in its column about a March 25
appearance in which Marvin Hamlisch "thrilled the audience by playing his own
compositions, as well as his favorites by other composers."
|
|||||