2007-01-14-Peretz |
||||
|
||||
|
jewishsightseeing.com, January 14, 2007 |
By Ira Sharkansky
JERUSALEM—Yet another action
by Amir Peretz in a week where he has been under attack from his
own party was to appoint Raleb or Ghaleb Majadele as a minister
in the government.
Majadele is a member of Knesset, but I had
never heard of him, and I do not recall seeing his face in the
newspaper or on television. His lack of prominence, and the
lack of significance of the office at stake appears in some
dispute as to how to spell his first name (Raleb or Ghaleb),
and whether his appointment is to the Ministry of Science,
Culture and Sport, or the Ministry of Science and Technology,
What is the big deal? Majadele is the first
Arab to head a government ministry. He is not the first Arab
minister. That honor went to a Druse appointed to be minister
without portfolio some years ago. But this is the first time
that an Arab and Muslim has headed a real ministry. To be
sure, there is not too much to the Ministry of Science,
Culture and Sport or the Ministry of Science and Technology.
It had been part of the Ministry of Education, Culture
and Sport, until it was hived off to make possible another
appointment with some distinction, and to ease yet another
party into the government coalition. It was given to a
well-known Jewish member of the Labor Party at the beginning
of the Olmert Government, but he resigned in protest over the
later expansion of the government to include the right-wing
party, Israel our Home (Israel Beitenu).
While some heralded the appointment for being
the first of an Arab Muslim as minister in an Israeli
government, others saw it as a transparent effort of Peretz to
do something dramatic in a week that has been especially
difficult for him. This action may help him survive the Labor
Party primary, scheduled in May. Perhaps 10 percent of
Labor members are Arabs, and they may vote for the man who
advanced their community.
But maybe not. Knesset members of Arab parties
are calling Majadele a puppet who is willing to be used by a
Jewish politician for his own purposes. They would call him
an "Uncle Tom" if American slang was part of their
vocabulary. An Arab rival of Majadele within the Labor Party,
a former Knesset member and deputy minister of foreign
affairs, said that the appointment would lead him to change
his mind about supporting Peretz. Now he is inclined to
support one of Peretz's rivals.
The sharpest criticism came from a Knesset
member of Israel our Home. She said, "The destruction of
the Jewish people will begin with this . . . It will bring
down Zionism. . . .Israel is a Jewish state . . .It is
supposed to be run as a Jewish state."
Those comments brought demands that the
Attorney General order a police investigation of racism and
racist incitement. If complied with, that could result in the
Knesset member losing her position.
What is especially interesting, is the
criticism heard from Arab politicians. Their lack of
enthusiasm and unity joins with some other recent developments
to suggest that Golda Meir may have been right when she
said, "There is no such thing as a
Palestinian people."
That line became a topic of ridicule among
Arabs and the Jewish left, and a symbol for Israeli blindness
to Palestinian nationalism. However, we see less unity than
personal and party antagonisms reflected in Arab comments
about Majadele's appointment. In the West Bank and Gaza,
neighborhood gangs, members of rival extended families, as
well as political and religious movements are fighting one
another in what looks more like chaos than ascendant
nationalism.
There are numerous Arab politicians in Israel
much better known than MK Majadleh. Yet the 10 or so Arab
members of most recent Knessets have typically been members of
three separate parties, that unite only in shrill and
persistent criticism of nearly everything the government does.
Unlike the establishment orientation of prominent
African-American politicians, the most visible Israeli Arab
politicians do not work within the major parties, and they get
little for their constituents. They provide evidence for the
proposition that, in politics, people get what they vote for.
If they vote for parties that compete for real political
power, they get resources for their community, as in the case
of African-Americans. If they vote mostly for parties that
take pride in opposition, like the Arab parties of Israel (or
if they boycott elections, as in the case of Arabs in
Jerusalem), they get what persistent opposition earns.
That ain't much.
|