__________________________________
Letter from
Jerusalem
_________________By Ira Sharkansky____________
Israeli football fans, students and anarchists
raise questions about the biases of the media
JERUSALEM—Three current events raise questions about media
bias, public opinion, and who makes the ultimate decisions. Oops, no one
makes "ultimate decisions." They are always subject to change. But some are
ultimate for the time being.
One: football fans broke through restraining fences in
order to reach the playing field and celebrate their team's victory. They
trampled several of their own, including two boys who remained unconscious
for the better part of 24 hours. Television pictures showed hundreds of
males ranging from sub-teens to the middle-aged with body language showing
great effort and some pain. Some of those who made it over the bodies of
their comrades jumped, did cartwheels, and swung from the goal posts in
ecstasy, while 30 ambulances maneuvered around them to collect the injured.
There were commentators who urged calm among the fans, but
the weight of coverage was understanding of their emotions, and critical of
the police for not assuring their safety.
Other views prevailed among league managers. They decided to
punish the team and its fans by requiring that its next four games be played
away from home, with its fans not to be allowed into the stadiums. There has
already been a minor riot protesting the injustice of the decision.
How to screen those buying tickets in order to exclude the
team's fans? Perhaps by the looks of those looking for combat. It will not
be easy. All teams' fans look about the same.
Two: the strike of university students entered its
third week. These young men and women, most likely from families with above
average incomes, want to reduce tuition, ideally to zero. There is a
government commission at work, considering by how much to increase tuition.
Currently the bill is the equivalent of US $3,000 per year. A typical
three-year BA at a university ranked among the best in the world costs
$12,000. There are scholarships, loans, and work-study programs for students
who cannot meet the costs out of savings, family resources, or current
income. As elsewhere, graduates are likely to earn substantially more over
their careers than those with less education.
The media and public opinion are mostly with the students.
Resolution of the dispute is complicated by considerable faculty support of
the students, faculty opposition to the same government commission on
account of other issues it is considering, and a government too preoccupied
with other things (mostly its own survival) to make protracted efforts to
solve this. Among the difficulties, the prime minister is also serving as
temporary finance minister, due to the finance minister's suspension while
under investigation for suspected criminal activity. Without a full-time
finance minister, it is more difficult than usual to deal with an economic
controversy.
Three: a group of about 200 Jewish "anarchists" and
Palestinians attacked part of the barrier working its way through the West
Bank. These attacks are standard events, occurring one or more times each
week. The barrier inconveniences Palestinians and enrages some Israeli Jews,
even while it makes it difficult for our neighbors to annoy us by drive-by
shootings, suicide bombings, stabbings, and car thefts.
Five reservists who had the job of protecting the barrier
were outnumbered by media personnel called by protesters to their event. We
saw replay after replay of the pushing and shoving employed by the soldiers.
Most dramatic was the picture of an officer who jabbed his weapon into the
stomach of a young Jewish man who was trying his best to be violent. It
hurt. The young man fell on the ground and held his tummy. Later we saw him
leaving the hospital, upright and in no apparent pain.
Within hours politicians were concerned about the soldiers'
overreaction, and a senior officer ordered the suspension of the man
photographed jabbing his weapon.
Other judgment may prevail. The event is bringing forth an
investigation. Substantial military and political voices are expressing
support for the five soldiers who had to deal with 200 protesters. Public
sympathy for Palestinians and Jewish anarchists is not assured.
What is the message in all of this?
We wanted a Jewish country. We got a Jewish country. The prophets will serve
as national icons until the Messiah arrives. Justice is a prime value.
Those who are outside of the elite (like football fans) claiming to be weak
or supporting the weak (like students, Palestinians, and Jewish anarchists)
have at least a short term advantage in public disputes. Whether they rule
is a more complicated question. Our ancestors granted the prophets holy
status as critics of the well-to-do and the rulers. We never let the
prophets govern.
(return to top)