2006-06-14-Propaganda-deaths, round two |
||||
|
||||
|
jewishsightseeing.com, June 14, 2006 |
By Ira Sharkansky
JERUSALEM—The story of the Palestinian
family killed by an explosion on a Gaza beach will not go
away.
Human Rights Watch produced an expert who
claims that the explosion came from an Israeli artillery
bombardment. Kofi Anan has cast doubt on the IDF
explanation that it was not responsible, and is sending
his own expert to examine the event.
Neither Human Rights Watch nor Kofi Anan
come to this controversy with clean hands. Human Rights
Watch is one of those organizations that has signed on to
the Palestinian cause, and predictably finds Israel to be
racist and in violation of international laws. Anan has
signaled his acceptance of targeted assassinations done by
the United States in Iraq, but distinguishes them from
Israeli efforts to defend its citizens. He was not so
quick to condemn mass murder and rape in Darfur, or to
send his inspectors to check on reports of genocide in the
Congo.
There will be no absolute determination of
truth in this case.
The reason appears in an interchange with
one of my correspondents. Khalid Amayreh lives in Hebron,
writes for the Aljareera English language internet site,
and occasionally puts my views into his reports.
He wrote to me:
I responded:
He came back to me:
Inherent in Khalid's remarks is the
explanation of why we are stuck. We do not read history
the same way, so we do not look at the present in the same
way. That is not likely to change.
On the other hand, this is not about a
debate in a seminar. In all probability, Israel will
continue to defend itself despite condemnations from Human
Rights Watch and Kofi Anan. More important is what
Israelis hear from Sderot, and from the left wing of
centrist political parties. Yesterday two technicians came
to my home from a company located in Sderot. The young
child of one cries every night. Their wives and children
want to leave the town, but no one will buy their
apartments.
Right wing parties want more action against
the Palestinians. The centrist left is important because
it defines the outer boundaries of the policymaking
establishment. Israelis further to the left often define
themselves as off the rails.
Amnon Mitzna led the Labor Party to defeat
in the election of 2003. He first came to prominence as a
general who criticized Defense Minister Ariel Sharon for
his conduct of the war in Lebanon. If anyone deserves the
label of accommodationist without being on the fuzzy
fringe of Human Rights Watch or Kofi Anan, it is him.
Today he is holding forth in support of the IDF's analysis
of what happened at the beach, and insisting that Israel
continue its attack against those who attack its citizens.
And the beach is not the most recent of
problematic incidents. Yesterday the IDF sent a missile
against a car carrying a missile, along with one of the
bad guys who have been involved in firing them at Israeli
civilians. The missile stopped the car, but did not
destroy it. Nearby Palestinians surrounded the car, and
several of them paid with their lives when a second
missile finished with the bad guy.
Lesson: Do not play in traffic, especially
when the IDF is likely to be there. Israel regrets
collateral damage, but when the likes of Amnon Mitzna
define the priority as stopping attacks against our
civilians, it is likely to be dangerous for Palestinians
to be close to their fighters. There is a limit to which
we can protect people from themselves.
Meanwhile the conflict between Hamas and
Fatah in heating up. Each side in a Palestinian civil war
may seek to score points by attacking Israel. But as
usual, they are likely to pay the higher price.
We hope for better, but it is best to
recognize what is real.
Sharkansky is an emeritus member of the political science department at Hebrew University in Jerusalem |
— |