2006-08-09-Lebanon-Israel |
||||
|
||||
|
jewishsightseeing.com, August 9, 2006 |
By Ira Sharkansky
JERUSALEM—It is easier to fight
someone else's war than one's own.
Henry Kissinger lectures that it is necessary to define
clear goals, and says that he has not heard them from Israel this time.
What about the removal of a military threat from
Hezbollah? Not clear enough? I do not recall Kissinger's accomplishment
in Vietnam being as impressive as promised by a chain of presidents from
Kennedy through Johnson, Nixon, and Ford.
Charles Krauthheimer has expressed what is said to be a
view widely felt in the Bush administration: that Israel has been
disappointing in its failure to pursue a ground war more aggressively
and effectively.
Perhaps the Bush record in Afghanistan and Iraq stands as
a better model. If Krauthammer will volunteer himself or his son for one
of the fighting units, the IDF may reconsider its policy, to date, of
moving slowly and carefully.
The Russians are complaining about violations of
international law. Their actions in Chechnya and elsewhere in the
Caucasus are hardly more free of bloodshed. Their assertions against
"terror" do not stand up well against the discovery of their
high tech weapons that reached Hezbollah via Syria and/or Iran. Their
representatives responded angrily to Israeli queries.
Israelis also complain. Some (very few) say that we
should not have entered Lebanon at all, and a fair number say that we
should be wary of entering deeply and exposing our troops and their
supply lines to constant harassment. A larger number are demanding a
more aggressive posture. The prime minister has come under attack for
dithering, and being too concerned about the Israeli casualties likely
to come from a more aggressive ground war. There is also criticism of
the IDF's excessive concern for collateral damage. A number of retired
generals as well as some politicians are saying that Israel should play
by the same rules as Hezbollah. If that occurs, the Lebanese better dig
themselves some deeper cellars.
Yesterday the head of the IDF replaced the general who
had commanded the ground forces in Lebanon. It is conventional to see
this as signaling a different emphasis. There are as many as two more
divisions waiting on a government decision to enter Lebanon. A
non-representative group of 11,000 responding to an internet survey are
voting 76 to 24 in favor of widening the Israeli offensive. We are tired
of the Hezbollah rockets killing civilians and destroying buildings. The
government is moving poor residents, unable to care for themselves, out
of Kiryat Shmona.
Israel does not aspire to win this war in the same
sense that the allies smashed the Germans and Japanese in World War II.
This war will probably end when one side signals that it has reached the
limit of its desire to absorb damage, and will accept some demands of
the stronger side.
As I read the Israelis, they are not likely to issue a
signal like that. If Syria and Iran stay out of direct involvement, the
signal may come sooner or later from Hezbollah. Yet they are religious
fanatics. They show signs of fighting until the last Lebanese bridge
falls, the last power station dims, and the last humanitarian
organization says that it cannot reach its clients.
They are signs of Hezbollah weakening. It does not show
up in a lessening of the rockets they are firing, but in the incidence
of their casualties. Many of their best trained fighters may already be
dead. One group, along with its rockets, fell into Israeli hands after
they had fallen asleep in their bunker. It cannot be pleasant for small
groups to be under the constant pressure of a sizable army that sends
troops to fight around the clock.
The United Nations is trying to ring the bell. The
French, Russians, Americans, and Arabs are arguing as to how much their
insistence on a cease fire must take account of Lebanese
sensitivities. The Israeli government sat for 6 hours. At the end,
eight ministers voted to escalate; two abstained on account of a concern
for going too far; and one abstained because the decision was not
aggressive enough.
We are hoping that the young men of our family and others
will return home safely. I doubt that we will see them this weekend.
Sharkansky is an emeritus member of the political science department at Hebrew University in Jerusalem |
— |