2006-04-07—Goldberg Lectures: Israel-Palestinians |
||||
|
||||
|
|
LA
JOLLA, Calif.—A
favorite speaker for over 20 years among San Diego Jewish audiences, Israeli
Professor of Political Science Jacob Goldberg gave a series of three
lectures during the week of April 3 at the Lawrence Family Jewish Community
Center in the La Jolla section of San Diego..
His
second lecture, Tuesday evening, April 4, addressed “The Isreeli-Palestinian
Clash – Towards Settlement or Escalation.”
His
lecture focused on Hamas’ surprise victory in
the Palestinians’ January elections, in which Hamas won 74 of 132 of the
parliamentary seats, a clear majority for that terrorist organization.
Goldberg
confided that behind the scenes the weak Palestinian Authority (PA) officials
urged Israel to stop Hamas from participating at all.
With
Hamas’ open goal of Israel’s destruction, a Hamas strong showing was
neither in the interest of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah, the West,
nor the UN.
At
the same time, no group expected Hamas to win more than 40-45 percent of the seats.
The
determining factor, Goldberg related with disappointment, was the Bush
administration’s “blunder” of exerting pressure to let Hamas
participate.
This
was based upon Bush’s goal of “spreading democracy” to the Middle East
and a “conventional wisdom” that even terrorists, once responsible to an
electorate, will moderate their stance for the practical reason of retaining
voter appeal.
Such
a thesis has never been shown to work out, as witness Afghanistan under the
Taliban, Sudan in the 1980’s, and the ever-worsening
situation in Iran,
In
the case of Hamas, founded in 1987 as a “branch” of the radical Muslim
Brotherhood Organization (MBO), destruction of Israel is a primary element in
its charter, unlikely to be removed.
The
world until recently has opposed political legitimacy for defined terrorist
groups.
The
consensus has been that if elected, terrorists would gain undeserved
legitimacy and likely would proceed to dismantle the very democratic
institution that elected them, such as occurred in Nazi Germany.
Accordingly
the Brotherhood has been banned or at least greatly suppressed in various
Muslim elections, as in Egypt and Algeria.
Even
the UN had agreed with this, according to Goldberg.
Goldberg
explained that with the majority election of Hamas, the Israeli-Palestinian
equation has been converted from a conflict over nationalism to one over
religion.
The
PLO, founded in 1964, expressed a nationalistic goal in its charter, namely to
regain "Arab
land.” Yassar
Arafat was a secular leader.
To
Hamas, Israel is "Islamic land.”
The
MBO was founded in 1928, in the wake of the Ottoman Empire’s collapse after
World War I.
That
era, after the West’s division of the Empire into multiple secular states,
represented the first time in some six centuries when an Islamic religious
state did not exist.
The
mullahs’ desire to restore a clergy-controlled society resulted in the
formation of the Brotherhood.
Over
the decades since, various branches of the MBO in the several Muslim countries
had tried unsuccessfully to gain control of the countries, generally with
violent means.
In
the few places where they won elections (never more than 15 percent of legislative
seats), they were voided or suppressed by the controlling king or dictator, as
in Algeria and Egypt.
In
Turkey, The MBO won elections in 2005, but the military, per a constitutional
escape feature inserted by Ataturk in 1921 at Turkey’s founding, stepped in
to void the MBO’s control.
Goldberg
pointed out that the MBO is a Sunni organization, and in fact
except in Iran and Iraq, Sunnis are the heavily prevalent sect of Islam.
Sunnis
comprise 90 percent of the 1.2 billion Muslims in the world.
Al-Qaeda
is a Sunni organization.
Generally
the militant MBO’s various branches in the Muslim world have refused to
participate in elections, but in January’ elections they saw opportunity to
use a new strategy— to take over the Palestinian enterprise from within.
Bush’s
“blunder” gave them their opportunity, helped greatly by the
Palestinians’ disgust with the corruption of the Palestinian Authority from
the time of Arafat.
Hamas’
successful social programs for the Palestinians in contrast to those of the
failed PA, mitigated its openly violent stance toward Israel, which had
provoked retaliation upon them.
Unfortunately, both the European Union (EU) and the USA, despite their recognition of Hamas as terrorists, encouraged its participation in the January elections without a prior promise that it renounce violence, recognize Israel, and accept the prior signed agreements by the PA. It is only after the elections that they make such demands, a rather naïve position.
Goldberg
posed the current dilemma over the unknown future Palestinian direction,
namely “How will Hamas behave?”
Fatah’s
Chairman Abbas still controls the PA, and ostensibly its military and its
money.
Abbas
believes that if Hamas doesn’t change its hostile stance in the eyes of the
world, he as executive can dissolve the parliament and order new elections.
Under
that scenario, it would be hoped that the Palestinian electorate would see its error in January and not make the same mistake again.
A
worldwide boycott of the Palestinian economy would support such a development.
Unfortunately
donor states have supported the Palestinians for decades, despite their
hostility to Israel, their intifadas, and their habit of siphoning off large
amounts of the funding to private bank accounts.
Goldberg
said the
West has maintained an ironic attitude that if it does
not give money to the Palestinians, they’ll “become radical.”
On
the other hand, what Hamas seems to want to do is to extend a hudna
(temporary cease fire), during which time it would “arm itself to the
teeth,” only to attack Israel later. The hudna, Goldberg explained, was a
strategy stated by Mohammed himself in the 7th Century.
When
he was weak, he made a truce only to violate it later when he became stronger
than his adversary.
Israel
meanwhile will play a watchful game for at least a few months. Goldberg said.
Should
it accept a hudna, even for a while?
How
can it keep the USA and the EU firm and vigilant against terrorism?
What
is the best way to ensure a message to Palestinians that the election of Hamas
was an error?
Which
Palestinian competing group will ultimately control its police and army?
If
the Palestinians were to become a valid negotiating partner, Israel could resume
participation in the suspended Bush "road map."
If
not, Israel will discontinue its withdrawal policy, complete the separation
fence, and continue to dominate militarily.
Goldberg, a Ph. D. professor of political science at the Dayan Center of the
Middle East, of Tel Aviv University, first lectured at UCSD and the JCC over
20 years ago.
He
regularly returns to San Diego. to lecture.
As
has become typical, he attracted for this lecture an estimated crowd of over 300, and gave a
detailed lucid account practically without notes.
At
a Q&A period following the lecture, he fielded questions for a half-hour,
and numerous listeners collared him privately further before he left the
premises.
|